Distinguishing HRM from Personnel Management
Evolving Dynamics: Distinguishing HRM from Personnel Management
Historical Evolution
The early 20th century, which saw the emergence of large-scale organizations and industrialization, is when HRM first emerged. When managing the workforce became more complex in the beginning, personnel management evolved as a response. Employee maintenance, compliance, and record-keeping were the main administrative responsibilities of personnel management, which had its roots in the bureaucratic paradigm. After World War II, however, the business world experienced a paradigm shift as employers began to realize that their staff members are valuable assets rather than just resources. This change paved the way for human resource management to emerge from personnel management.
Philosophy and Focus
Human resource management (HRM) takes a strategic approach to aligning organizational goals with human resources, whereas personnel management historically focused on administrative tasks like payroll and attendance. Preventive measures are given top priority in HRM in order to improve worker engagement, well-being, and productivity. This represents a change from conventional administrative duties to a proactive, strategic role in workforce optimization for the success of the organization as a whole.
Employee Relations
By emphasizing control and rule compliance, personnel management frequently upheld a somewhat antagonistic relationship between employers and employees. An environment of inclusive and cooperative employee relations is fostered by HRM. It aims to establish a positive work environment by promoting candid communication and using mediation and resolution to resolve disputes.
Decision-Making Authority
HR usually provides advice in personnel management, with top management having the last say in decisions. Decentralizing decision-making throughout organizational levels and encouraging flexibility and adaptability are two ways that HRM fosters strategic dialogue. This strategy improves the organization's ability to adapt to a changing environment by empowering managers and employees to actively engage with changing business challenges.
Training and Development
Training was frequently seen by personnel managers as an expense, with an emphasis on developing skills for particular job requirements. The goal of training and development, according to HRM, is to improve employees' skills, abilities, and career development in order to achieve long-term organizational success.
Role in Strategic Planning
Human
Resource Management (HRM) has evolved from the traditional reactive approach to
personnel management to a proactive role in strategic planning. HRM actively
contributes to the creation and execution of business strategies by
coordinating organizational objectives with human capital strategies. This
change guarantees a more progressive and integrated approach, enabling HRM to
make a major contribution to the organization's overall performance and
sustainability.
In
conclusion, human resource management emerged as a thorough and strategic
approach to managing people within organizations, while personnel management
established the foundation for employee administration. The change from
personnel management to human resource management (HRM) represents a change
from a bureaucratic, rule-based system to a dynamic, strategic collaboration between
management and staff. Organizations can successfully navigate the complexities
of the contemporary business landscape and create a collaborative, innovative,
and sustainable growth-oriented workplace by acknowledging and appreciating
these distinctions.
Dessler, G. (2019). Human Resource Management. CIPD.
Brewster, C., & Hegewisch, A. (Eds.). (2017). Policy and Practice in European Human Resource Management. CIPD.
Ulrich, D., Brockbank, W., & Johnson, D. (2009). The HR Value Proposition. CIPD.
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2017). Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. CIPD.
Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical
Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management. CIPD.
Agree with your points. Basically The main difference between Personnel Management and Human Resource Management lies in their scope and orientation. personnel management has limited scope and HRM has wide scope.
ReplyDeleteThe objectives of the HRM span right from the manpower needs assessment to management and retention of the same. To this effect Human resource management is responsible for effective designing and implementation of various policies, procedures and programs
Delete
ReplyDeleteHRM helps organizations make better decisions and plans for the future, which leads to greater success. Furthermore, HRM fosters Employee Engagement and creativity and promotes autonomy and accountability.
Yes, in HRM human recourses considered as an asset where as in personal management it has considered as a cost.
DeleteBasically Personnel management focuses on hiring and managing employees, equipping them to effectively perform specific tasks for the company. HR management has a wider focus that includes employee development and wellbeing, to help retain employees and monitor progress or concerns.They share the same main objective, which is to help the company to achieve its goals, although they have different approaches to this. However both negotiate employee contracts, although personnel management focuses more on collective bargaining, whilst HR management deals with individual employee contracts.
ReplyDelete